JPC rejects all amendments to Waqf Bill made by Opposition
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 4)
Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity |
Context |
|
Key Features of the Bill
- Main Proposal: The Bill initially sought to remove the concept of “Waqf by user”, which allowed properties to be considered Waqf simply due to their long-term use for religious purposes. This proposal caused concern over the potential threat to several religious structures.
- Amendments Accepted:
- Waqf by User: A concession was offered, allowing Waqf properties under “Waqf by user” to remain, except for those in dispute or government facilities. These properties must be registered before the new law comes into effect.
- Dispute Resolution: The Bill removed the requirement for District Collectors to inquire into disputes over government property, instead allowing state governments to designate a higher-ranking officer for the task.
- Non-Muslim Members on Waqf Board: The amendment allows up to four non-Muslim members on the Waqf Board, even though this move was opposed by Muslim bodies.
- Mutawalli Authority: An amendment gives the caretaker (Mutawalli) authority to extend the period for declaring property details, with consent from the Waqf tribunal.
- Waqf Tribunals: An amendment was made to include a member with knowledge of Muslim law in Waqf tribunals.
Opposition’s Concerns
- The Opposition moved amendments to remove provisions they felt were detrimental to minority rights, including the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Waqf Board and the donation rights for non-Muslims.
- They expressed dissatisfaction with being unable to discuss amendments or present their views, citing their concern over minority protection.
Practice Question: Discuss the key provisions and objectives of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill and its potential impact on religious properties in India. (150 Words /10 marks) |
Check more- Does cow urine have anti-infective properties?