| |

23 April 2025 : Indian Express Editorial Analysis

Get Your PDF Download Pdf

1. A global trade reset

Table of Contents

(Source – Indian Express, Section – The Editorial Page – Page No. – 12)

Topic: GS3 – Indian Economy

Context

  • The United States abruptly shifted to a highly protectionist trade policy, imposing steep tariffs and challenging the global trading system it once led.

The Current State of US Trade Policy

  • The article begins by detailing the dramatic transformation in the United States’ trade policy over the past two months.
  • The US has implemented a universal 10% tariff, with steep duties of 25% on sectors like steel, aluminum, and autos (except for USMCA-compliant nations), and 20% on certain electronics.
  • Even more striking are the punitive tariffs on Chinese imports—ranging up to 145% on $350 billion worth of goods—raising the effective average US tariff to over 25%, and a staggering 110% for Chinese imports.
  • This is a significant leap from just four months prior when average tariffs hovered around 3.5%.

Impending Risks and Global Repercussions

  • The trajectory suggests more tariffs are likely on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and raw materials like copper.
  • Negotiations with key partners like the EU and India hang in the balance, and if they falter, reciprocal tariffs may be reinstated.
  • Such a rapid escalation has led institutions like JP Morgan to predict a 60% likelihood of a global recession, with the US already tipped into recession and China expected to slow sharply.

Misplaced Optimism in Negotiated Resolutions

  • Some analysts view the tariff surge as a negotiation tactic, expecting eventual moderation.
  • However, the article challenges this optimism, arguing that such speculation misses the fundamental shift occurring.
  • The focus, they argue, should not be on the tactical aspects of tariffs or even their stated goals—like correcting trade imbalances or reviving domestic manufacturing—but rather on the strategic dismantling of the global trade system itself.

A Rejection of the Global Order the US Once Built

  • At the heart of the current policy is a rejection of the very global economic system the US once championed.
  • The administration’s view—that the US has suffered persistent trade deficits and manufacturing losses due to unfair global practices and an overvalued dollar—is a sharp departure from traditional economic consensus.
  • While economists argue these deficits are more reflective of domestic savings and fiscal imbalances, the US leadership appears intent on reshaping the international economic architecture regardless of these theories.

The Implications for the Global Economic Structure

  • The global trading system isn’t just about trade—it underpins the economic structure of virtually every country.
  • Advanced economies dominate design and marketing, emerging markets specialize in manufacturing, and developing countries supply raw materials.
  • The current US approach threatens to unravel this finely balanced interdependence, with potentially seismic consequences for global economic models.

What It Means for India

  • India’s ambitions to be a global manufacturing hub could face serious setbacks.
  • If the US—a $4.1 trillion importer—turns inward, others will be compelled to follow suit. India, therefore, must pivot towards bolstering domestic demand as a growth driver, a shift that challenges its long-standing policy assumptions.
  • Increasing domestic consumption would necessitate reducing savings—a difficult shift for a country that has historically prioritized high savings to fund investment.
  • Moreover, this would demand liberalizing financial systems and rethinking reforms in land, labor, education, and health to serve internal growth rather than export competitiveness.

Reorienting Infrastructure and Policy

  • India’s infrastructure growth has been geared towards global integration—airports, ports, and highways serve international trade more than domestic connectivity.
  • A new orientation would require significant investments in internal trade routes and domestic logistics.
  • The lack of direct transport links between major commercial hubs like Kanpur and Coimbatore exemplifies the gap in domestic connectivity.

Conclusion

  • The article concludes with a stark warning: the US trade policy shift marks a generational upheaval in the global economic order.
  • It challenges the foundational arrangement of global trade that has persisted for six decades.
  • The full ramifications are not just unpredictable—they are, the article argues, dangerously underestimated by much of the world.

Practice Question: The recent shift in US trade policy signifies not just protectionism but a challenge to the global trading system itself. In this context, critically examine the implications of such a shift for India’s economic strategy, particularly its goal of becoming a global manufacturing hub.  (250 Words /15 marks)

Read more22 April 2025 : Indian Express Editorial Analysis

Similar Posts