| |

05 May 2025: The Hindu Editorial Analysis

Get Your PDF Download Pdf

1. India is looking for partners, not preachers

(Source – Page 4, The Hindu International Edition​)

Topic: GS2 (International Relations, India and its Neighborhood, India’s Foreign Policy)

Context
  • External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, at the Arctic Circle India Forum, emphasized India’s independent foreign policy stance amid geopolitical churn, especially regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

India’s Assertive Foreign Policy:

  • Jaishankar reiterated India’s strategic autonomy, asserting India’s focus on mutual partnerships over Western prescriptions.

  • He criticized the Western approach of excluding Russia from peace talks on Ukraine and advocated for “Russia realism” and “America realism”.

India-Russia Relations:

  • India’s continued oil imports from Russia are seen as based on national interest, not ideological alignment.

  • India’s position is that of an energy consumer in need of affordable access, especially in the wake of sanctions on Russia.

India-Europe Relations:

  • He stated Europe must overcome its “preaching mindset” and engage with India on equal footing, based on mutual respect and interest.

India’s Global Stance:

  • India does not endorse externally-imposed solutions but supports regional peace through engagement.

  • This signals India’s evolution into a confident regional power asserting its agency.

Way Forward:

  • A multipolar world demands new diplomacy rooted in mutual interests.

  • India’s stance will shape future multilateral forums and trade alignments.

Practice Question: India’s foreign policy in the post-2020 era has been marked by a shift from non-alignment to multi-alignment. Examine with special reference to India’s stand on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and its relationship with Europe. (250 words)

2. Will give a befitting reply to those who attack India: Rajnath

(Source – Page 4, The Hindu Editorial​)

Topic: GS3 (Internal Security, Cross-border Terrorism), GS2 (India-Pakistan Relations)

Context
  • In response to the recent Pahalgam terror attack, India’s Defence Minister highlighted preparedness for a strong counter-response, raising questions about India’s evolving security doctrine.

Read more – 03 May 2025: The Hindu Editorial Analysis

Security Doctrine Shift:

  • Rajnath Singh emphasized complete operational freedom granted to the armed forces.

  • Blackout rehearsals in Punjab suggest heightened alert amid threat perception.

India-Pakistan Tensions:

  • The Pahalgam attack and Pakistan’s retaliatory moves (e.g., banning Indian ships) have worsened relations.

  • India’s response includes diplomatic measures like suspending Indus Water Treaty arrangements.

Strategic Autonomy in Security:

  • The Indian Army and IAF have stepped up coordination with political leadership.

  • Intelligence, emergency preparedness, and maritime vigilance are being emphasized.

Diplomacy vs. Retaliation:

  • While military action is on the table, India is also exploring global diplomatic backing.

  • Iran’s offer to mediate (Page 1) remains unacknowledged by India, consistent with its stand against third-party mediation.

Way Forward:

  • Emphasis on hybrid retaliation (diplomatic, economic, and potential military).

  • A doctrine balancing assertive response and regional peace is emerging.

Practice Question: With rising cross-border terrorism and hybrid threats, India’s security doctrine is evolving. Discuss the emerging trends in India’s counter-terrorism strategy. (250 words)

Read more – 03 May 2025: The Hindu Editorial Analysis

Similar Posts