26 March 2025 : The Hindu Editorial Analysis
1. The ‘Great Abandonment’ of Afghanistan
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 8)
Context |
|
Historical U.S. Engagement with Afghanistan
- The U.S. previously engaged with Afghanistan’s government but later shifted its focus.
- In 2017, a deal was signed to allow U.S. companies access to Afghanistan’s rare earth minerals.
- In 2018, the U.S. began talks with the Taliban without involving the elected government.
- In 2020, the Doha Accords were signed, favoring the Taliban without securing commitments on political stability, counter-terrorism, or women’s rights.
- This agreement weakened the Afghan government, leading to the Taliban takeover.
Current Situation in Afghanistan
- The Taliban now has a strong grip on the country, with stricter rules, especially against women.
- Women are banned from education, work, and public life, reversing progress made over two decades.
- Despite no international recognition, regional powers have engaged with the Taliban, allowing them diplomatic presence.
- The U.S. and European nations have distanced themselves, while neighboring countries have increased ties with the regime.
India’s Approach to Afghanistan
- India has maintained a cautious approach, neither recognizing the Taliban nor fully supporting the previous Afghan diplomats.
- In 2022, India reopened a “technical mission” in Kabul, engaging at an official level.
- A recent high-level meeting discussed India’s plans to expand its presence and resume development projects in Afghanistan.
Reasons Behind India’s Engagement with the Taliban
- Pragmatism and Realpolitik
- It is argued that the Taliban’s rule is long-term, making engagement necessary.
- However, internal conflicts within the Taliban over education policies and economic mismanagement indicate instability.
- Humanitarian Aid
- Some claim working with the Taliban is necessary for aid delivery, but India had provided aid before without direct Taliban engagement.
- Strategic Interests
- There is concern that India may lose influence if it does not reopen its embassy while other countries establish their presence.
- However, historical partnerships with the previous Afghan government cannot be replicated with the Taliban due to ideological differences.
Challenges for India
- The Taliban previously targeted Indian interests, raising concerns about security.
- India’s visa policies for Afghans fleeing the Taliban have disappointed many who previously supported India.
- Afghans who took refuge in India in the past contributed positively to bilateral ties, but current restrictions may weaken India’s long-term influence.
Policy Recommendations for India
- India should balance engagement with the Taliban while maintaining relations with opposition groups.
- Women’s rights and political representation should be actively supported.
- The cricket board should encourage recognition of the Afghan women’s team.
- Hosting discussions for Afghan exiles in India could help in addressing political concerns.
- A flexible foreign policy is needed to maintain long-term influence in Afghanistan.
Conclusion
- India should engage with Afghanistan pragmatically while ensuring its strategic interests and humanitarian commitments.
- Balancing ties with both the Taliban and exiled Afghan communities is crucial for long-term regional stability and goodwill.
PYQ: The proposed withdrawal of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) from Afghanistan in 2014 is fraught with major security implications for the countries of the region. Examine in light of the fact that India is faced with a plethora of challenges and needs to safeguard its own strategic interests. (200 words/10m) (UPSC CSE (M) GS-2 2013) |
Practice Question: Discuss the implications of India’s evolving engagement with the Taliban-led Afghanistan government. How can India balance its strategic interests while supporting Afghan democratic aspirations? (250 Words /15 marks) |
2. A bad omen for public trust in vaccines
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 9)
Context |
|
Issues Raised in Petitions
- These concerns should not be mistaken for anti-vaccine conspiracy theories.
- One petition from Kerala raised concerns about deaths linked to the anti-rabies vaccine.
- Other petitions question the lack of transparency in clinical trial data and the disclosure of vaccine side effects.
- There are also demands for better monitoring of adverse reactions and proper compensation for those affected.
- Many petitioners do not trust the regulatory body and want independent committees to review vaccine approvals.
Role of Courts and Legal Challenges
- Courts are not well-suited to handle scientific issues related to vaccines.
- These cases take years to resolve and often do not provide clear conclusions.
- Vaccine manufacturers have filed defamation lawsuits against critics, leading to further legal battles.
- Some courts have issued orders protecting vaccine manufacturers, which could weaken public trust.
Lack of Transparency in Vaccine Approval
- The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) plays a major role in vaccine approvals.
- However, details about decision-makers and their conflicts of interest are not disclosed.
- Making this information public could improve trust in the approval process.
Need for Better Clinical Trial Data Disclosure
- The CDSCO does not release clinical trial data used for vaccine approvals.
- Publicly sharing this data, while protecting patient privacy, would increase transparency.
Informed Consent and Public Awareness
- Citizens need clear information about vaccine side effects to make informed decisions.
- This information should be presented in an understandable format at the time of vaccination.
Strengthening Vaccine Monitoring
- India does not have a strong legal framework for tracking adverse vaccine reactions.
- Existing guidelines are not fully enforced and need to be backed by law.
Compensation for Vaccine-Related Deaths
- Some petitions demand compensation for families of those who may have died due to vaccine side effects.
- A court ruling in 2022 asked the government to create a policy for compensation, but the final decision is still pending.
Responsibility for Compensation
- Vaccine manufacturers should compensate affected individuals since they profit from vaccine sales.
- The government’s role in compensation remains unclear due to undisclosed agreements with manufacturers.
Conclusion
- Except for compensation, other concerns should be addressed through policies, not court cases.
- Public trust in vaccines is essential for successful immunization programs.
- The Ministry of Health should take steps to address these concerns through clear policies or new laws.
Practice Question: How can transparency in vaccine approval, informed consent, and compensation mechanisms be improved in India to enhance public trust in the immunization process? (150 Words /10 marks) |
Read more- 25 March 2025 : The Hindu Editorial Analysis