Lok Sabha Speaker to Consult All Parties Before Finalising Leaders of Opposition

Get Your PDF Download Pdf

(Source: Page 1, The Hindu)

Also Read: The Indian Express Editorial Analysis: 07 July 2025
Also Read: The Hindu Editorial Analysis: 07 July 2025

Topic: GS2 – Polity and Governance
Context
  • After the constitution of the 18th Lok Sabha, the new Speaker announced that he would consult all parties before deciding on who will be recognized as the Leader of Opposition.

  • This move comes amid debates over opposition strength and parliamentary procedures.

Legal and Constitutional Basis

  • The post of Leader of Opposition is not a constitutional one, but it derives statutory recognition through the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977.

  • Article 93 provides for the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker but does not explicitly mention the LoP.

. Controversy Around 10% Rule

  • Conventionally, only a party with at least 10% of the total strength of the House is granted LoP status.

  • However, this 10% rule is not codified in the Constitution or statute and has been debated for its undemocratic nature.

. Importance of LoP

  • Plays a vital role in democratic functioning by:

    • Representing dissent and checking the executive.

    • Being a part of key selection committees (e.g., CBI Director, Lokpal, Chief Vigilance Commissioner).

  • Ensures pluralism and provides a structured channel for opposition voices.

. Current Relevance

  • The new Speaker’s intention to consult all parties may signal a more inclusive and participative parliamentary environment.

  • The lack of LoP in past Lok Sabhas (e.g., 16th Lok Sabha) raised concerns over weakened oversight mechanisms.

Way Forward:

  • Revisit the 10% convention to allow for more inclusive representation of the opposition.

  • Codify the process to ensure clarity and uphold democratic values.

Practice Question: (GS-3 | 15 Marks | 250 Words)
Discuss the role and significance of the Leader of Opposition in the Indian parliamentary system. Do you think the 10% norm should be revised to enhance democratic representation?

 

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *