|

POCSO cases can be quashed based on settlement in certain circumstances: Kerala HC.

Get Your PDF Download Pdf

(Source – Page 3, The Hindu International Edition (April 29, 2025)

Topic: GS 2– Governance, Judiciary, Vulnerable Sections, GS-4 :- Ethics, Integrity & Human Values.
Context
  • The Kerala High Court recently observed that not all cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act are beyond settlement.
  • In rare, extreme mitigating circumstances—particularly when the victim and accused have married and wish to move forward—the court may consider quashing proceedings in the interest of justice.

Key Observations by the High Court

  • Merely because a case is registered under POCSO Act, it does not automatically preclude the court from quashing it if there is a genuine settlement.
  • In the cited cases, the accused and survivors got married, and the families reached a mutual settlement.
  • The High Court quashed two such cases, underscoring that the spirit of justice must prevail over procedural rigidity in exceptional scenarios.

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

  • Section 482 of CrPC grants High Courts the power to quash criminal proceedings if continuing them would amount to abuse of process or result in injustice.
  • POCSO Act, being a special law, typically does not allow compromise due to the age of the victim and seriousness of offences (e.g., sexual assault).
  • However, non-heinous offences or cases involving consensual relationships near the age of consent, especially with post-facto marriage, have been reconsidered by courts on humanitarian grounds.

Mitigating Circumstances Considered

  • Age proximity of victim and accused.
  • Genuine relationship with consent.
  • Subsequent marriage and cohabitation.
  • Victim’s and family’s desire to end litigation.
  • The trauma of prolonged trial versus the goal of rehabilitation.

Ethical Dilemma

  • While justice to the victim is paramount, the court must weigh whether continuing a case serves corrective purpose or merely creates further trauma.
  • Critics argue such leniency might dilute deterrence under POCSO and potentially be misused.
  • The ruling shows a case-specific approach, not a blanket relaxation.

Way Forward

  • Courts must uphold the best interest of the child and protection of dignity while exercising discretion.
  • The government should issue clearer guidelines on quashing POCSO cases in limited circumstances.
  • Emphasis should be placed on legal awareness, gender-sensitive education, and expeditious trials.
Practice Question: In light of recent judicial observations, critically evaluate the scope of quashing proceedings under the POCSO Act in cases involving post-marriage settlement between the victim and the accused. Should such a provision exist? Justify your answer with legal and ethical reasoning.
(Answer in 250 words).

check more – In 2024, India’s military expenditure was nine times that of Pakistan: SIPRI.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *