Liberty Is Not Licence
Liberty Is Not Licence
(Source: Editorial Page, The Indian Express)
Topic:
GS4: Ethics in Public Discourse, Liberty and Responsibility; GS2: Fundamental Rights, Reasonable Restrictions |
Context |
|
Constitutional Framework:
-
Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
-
However, Article 19(2) permits reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order, decency, morality, sovereignty, and integrity of India.
-
The editorial reaffirms that liberty does not imply unbounded license to provoke, defame, or disrupt public harmony.
Ethical Boundaries of Expression:
-
Liberty must be exercised with restraint, especially by public intellectuals and influential figures.
-
Expressing dissent is democratic, but inciting distrust against national institutions without evidence may justify scrutiny.
Role of Judiciary:
-
The courts must carefully evaluate intention vs. interpretation in controversial speech.
-
The editorial leans toward the need for balanced adjudication, ensuring neither liberty is abused nor restrictions are misused.
Societal Implications:
-
An unchecked culture of provocation under the banner of liberty can deepen social polarisation.
-
On the other hand, over-censorship can erode democratic discourse and academic freedom.
Conclusion/Way Forward
-
Liberty is a sacred constitutional right, but it thrives only when citizens recognize its moral limits.
-
The state must apply restrictions narrowly and proportionately, ensuring they are not tools of political retaliation.
-
Judicial clarity, civic education, and responsible public dialogue are essential to strike the balance between liberty and license.
Practice Question:
Discuss the constitutional and ethical boundaries of freedom of speech in India. How can a balance be maintained between liberty and public responsibility in a democratic society? GS2– 250 Words (15 Marks) |