India, China must move forward on de-escalation, Jaishankar tells Wang

Get Your PDF Download Pdf
Topic: GS 2 – International Relations: India and Neighbourhood.
Context
  • External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on July 14, 2025, marking his first visit to China since 2019 and the Galwan clashes of 2020.
    • India stressed the need to move forward on de-escalation along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), after achieving disengagement nine months ago.
    • Called for normalisation of people-to-people ties and the removal of restrictive trade measures (referring to Chinese export restrictions on critical minerals).
    • Highlighted the importance of zero tolerance on terrorism in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) context.

    Both sides acknowledged progress in restoring bilateral engagement mechanisms and discussed PM Modi’s upcoming visit to China for the SCO Summit in September 2025.

Background

India-China Relations Post-Galwan (2020): The Galwan clashes led to the deadliest confrontation in 45 years, causing a sharp deterioration in relations. Since then, multiple rounds of military and diplomatic talks have led to disengagement at some friction points, but de-escalation and demobilisation of troops remain pending.

Current Status: Disengagement achieved in Dec 2024 → Peace maintained at LAC. 

Area occupied by China after the Galwan Clash: 

However, teports following the 2020 standoff estimate Chinese occupation of previously Indian-patrolled territory across several friction zones:

  • Depsang region: Around 900 km²
  • Pangong Tso area: ~65 km²
  • Galwan Valley: ~20 km²
  • Hot Springs / Gogra: ~12 km²
  • Chushul sector: ~20 km²
  • Overall (across multiple points): Estimates range from 1,000 km² to 2,000 km²

Efforts underway to resume trade, religious pilgrimages (Kailash Mansarovar Yatra restarted after 5 years), and high-level visits (NSA, Defence Minister, now EAM).

Key Issues Discussed

  1. Border Situation: Jaishankar reiterated that full normalisation is not possible without resolving border issues. He urged for the de-escalation of troops, the next step after disengagement. It means that India wants back the land taken in 2020.
  2. Economic and Trade Ties: India raised concerns over Chinese export restrictions on critical minerals, calling for the removal of barriers and the promotion of trade.
  3. SCO Cooperation: India emphasised that the SCO’s mandate is to combat terrorism, separatism, and extremism and urged for “zero tolerance for terrorism” in the SCO joint statement.
  4. Geopolitical Dynamics: China highlighted the need for trust, not suspicion, and called for resisting unilateral protectionism and bullying by powerful countries (implied reference to the U.S.).

Significance of the Meeting

  • First Visit in 6 Years: Signals a gradual thaw in ties ahead of PM Modi’s visit for the SCO Summit.
  • Border Issue Still Central: Despite progress in other areas, LAC tensions remain the biggest hurdle to full normalisation.
  • Strategic Messaging: India reinforced its stand on sovereignty and terrorism. China pitched for bilateral cooperation within a changing global order and the Global South narrative.
  • Multilateral Context: Positions of India and China at the SCO Foreign Ministers’ meet will influence the joint statement, especially on terrorism.

Challenges Ahead

  • Heavy troop deployment continues, creating mistrust.
  • Critical mineral export curbs by China and India’s import dependence remain contentious.
  • India’s closer ties with the U.S. and the Quad vs. China’s global stance. 
  • China-Pakistan nexus, particularly on terrorism, remains a concern.

Implications for India’s Foreign Policy

  • Act East & Indo-Pacific Strategy: Balancing ties with China while deepening engagement with ASEAN and the Quad.
  • Strategic Autonomy: Maintaining issue-based cooperation with China on trade and multilateral forums while safeguarding territorial integrity.
  • SCO Role: India will push for a stronger language on terrorism and economic connectivity without compromising sovereignty.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *