She Too: When Systems Fail Victims of Sexual Harassment
(Source: The Indian Express, Editorial Page)
Also Read: The Indian Express Editorial Analysis: 16 July 2025
Also Read: The Hindu Editorial Analysis: 16 July 2025
Topic: GS2 – Governance, Issues Related to Women and Justice GS1 – Social Issues: Gender and Vulnerable Sections GS4 – Ethics: Accountability and Institutional Responsibility |
Context |
|
Institutional Failure and Legal Framework
-
The PoSH Act, 2013, was designed to ensure safe workplaces and educational institutions for women by mandating ICCs and clear redressal procedures. Yet, enforcement remains weak.
-
The victim reported harassment formally, but complaints were met with bureaucratic delays and insensitivity, exposing systemic flaws.
-
In 2023, the Supreme Court directed time-bound verification of compliance with PoSH norms, but poor implementation persists, leaving women vulnerable.
Why Complaints Still Fail
-
Institutional Apathy: Many organizations treat PoSH compliance as a checklist formality rather than a moral and legal responsibility.
-
Power Asymmetry: Perpetrators often hold influential positions, deterring victims from pursuing complaints due to fear of retaliation and stigma.
-
Culture of Silence: Persistent societal stigma, victim-blaming, and lack of trust in mechanisms prevent women from speaking up effectively.
Broader Impact on Women’s Safety
-
Inaction erodes trust in governance and judicial systems, discouraging others from reporting.
-
The recurring pattern—seen during the #MeToo movement and cases like the 2023 wrestlers’ protest—highlights systemic failure across sectors, including education and sports.
-
This undermines gender equality and reinforces socio-economic disadvantages for women.
Steps Taken So Far
-
Mandatory Internal Committees in all organizations under PoSH.
-
Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling for strict compliance audits.
-
However, lack of monitoring, awareness, and enforcement limits these provisions’ effectiveness.
Gaps vs Proposed Solutions
Challenge | Proposed Measure |
---|---|
Lack of timely redress | Implement time-bound inquiry mechanisms with penalties for delays |
Poor accountability of ICCs | Mandatory third-party audits and state-level supervisory bodies |
Fear of retaliation | Whistleblower protection and victim anonymity in proceedings |
Limited awareness | Intensive sensitization campaigns for faculty, students, and staff |
Ethical failure in leadership | Promote ethical codes in institutions with direct accountability of heads for non-compliance |
Way Forward
-
Legal Reinforcement: Amend PoSH rules to include penalties for institutional non-compliance and reporting delays.
-
Independent Oversight: Establish state-level gender safety authorities to monitor ICCs’ functioning.
-
Cultural Transformation: Launch nationwide campaigns that normalize reporting and dismantle stigma.
-
Integration with Governance: Make compliance a key criterion in accreditation of colleges and funding allocation.
Conclusion
The Balasore tragedy highlights a critical governance gap: legislation without effective implementation is meaningless. India must evolve from token compliance to proactive institutional accountability. Ensuring gender safety is not merely a legal duty—it is a cornerstone of ethical governance and constitutional morality.
Practice Question: (GS-2 | 15 Marks | 250 Words) “Despite the PoSH Act, 2013, systemic apathy continues to deny justice to victims of sexual harassment in India.” Discuss the reasons and suggest reforms to ensure effective enforcement. |